Application for new railway

Leeds Times
Saturday 20 November 1858


The Bradford, Wakefield and Leeds railway is applying for authority to make a railway from and by a double junction with the main line in Stanley-cum-Wrenthorpe, in the parish of Wakefield; one of such junctions at or near an occupation road, called Fox Lane, in the said township; and the other at or near the point where an occupation bridge, called Robert’s Bridge, passes under the same railway, in the said township, thence to pass in, through, or into the several parishes, townships, or places of Stanley, Wrenthorpe, Stanley-cum-Wrenthorpe, Alverthorpe, Thornes, Alverthorpe-cum-Thornes, Wakefield, Ossett, Gawthorpe, Ossett-cum-Gawthorpe, and Dewsbury, and to terminate in a field belonging to Joshua Whitaker, and in the occupation of Joshua Wilson, and adjoining a certain road called or known by the name or Intake Lane, in the township of Ossett and parish of Dewsbury. The same company is also applying for power to make a railway from the main line of the Bradford, Wakefield, and Leeds railway, in the township of Stanley-cum-Wrenthorpe, at a point about 440 yards north of the Lofthouse and Wrenthorpe Station, and also at a point about fifty yards south of the said station, in the same township; thence to pass in, through, or into the several parishes, townships, or places of Stanley, Wrenthorpe, Stanley-cum-Wrenthorpe, Lofthouse, Carlton, Lofthouse-cum-Carlton, Oulton Woodlesford Oulton-with-Woodlesford, Wakefield, Rothwell, and Methley and to terminate by a junction with the North-Eastern Railway at and on the north-west end of the bridge called Stephenson’s Bridge where the last mentioned railway crosses the River Calder in the township of Methley.

Landowner outFoxed by local residents

Leeds Times
Saturday 26 April 1884


Our precious footpaths through the fields are in danger in many parts of the country, and it will require strong and vigorous efforts to retain them from the grasp of rapacious landowners. The villagers of Wrenthorpe, near Wakefield, are of this opinion, as their vigorous proceedings have plainly demonstrated. An unsuccessful attempt has been made to close a footpath at Wrenthorpe. It is called Fox Lane, and crosses a field from Bradford Road to Wrenthorpe, being 632 yards in length, and passes through land owned by Mr George Lane Fox, of Bramham Park. On Saturday an adjourned meeting of the ratepayers was held to consider the subject, the proceedings being extraordinary. Before the business began, Mr Bryan Ramsden, who is not a ratepayer, and who persisted in being present, was forcibly ejected. He was seized by a number of sturdy villagers, who literally threw him into the lobby, where for a time he paced up and down, but ultimately disappeared. On behalf of a motion for closing the path it was urged that the ratepayers might soon have to ask Mr Fox to aid them in widening Potovens Lane [now Wrenthorpe Road], and that he would be more ready to do so if the footway was abandoned. Mr B Lees spoke strongly against the proposal, and on a vote being taken the numbers were 57 for closing and 68 for keeping it open. Mr G Lane Fox is one of the best of our Tory magnates, and if the case is put fairly and fully before him, free from what interested persons may say, he is not the man to refuse justice to any individual or any body of men.

The Lane Fox family had previously lived at Red Hall and were big local (absentee) land owners. Much of the Red Hall estate came up for auction in 1896.

Note how the Times can’t resist having a parting political swipe at local residents.



Now that the Wakefield newspapers have been added to the Archive, here’s how the Wakefield Free Press reported the meeting.

Wakefield Free Press
Saturday 19 April 1884


At the request of George Lane Fox, Esq., of Bramham Park, a meeting of ratepayers was called by Messrs. John Bastow and Frederick Barnaby, the surveyors of highways of the hamlet of Wrenthorpe, and held in the Board Schools on Thursday last, for the purpose of considering the desirability of stopping the footpath leading from Potovens Lane [now Wrenthorpe Road] to Fox Lane, and to the Bradford Road, in the above hamlet, the footpath in question being 632 yards in length, or thereabouts. The proceedings were of a most disorderly character from beginning to end, many of the ratepayers during the progress of the meeting squabbling in groups and carrying on controversies in high-pitched tones, and in a manner which rendered it impossible for the chairman to conduct the business of the meeting. Immediately the doors were opened the room was besieged by many who were non-ratepayers, and had no right to be present at the meeting. These were requested to either withdraw or adjourn to another part of the room. The latter course was decided upon, but ere many minutes had elapsed they returned, and again added their mite to the confusion prevailing.

Mr Bastow contended that Mr Bryan Ramsden was not a ratepayer, and had no right to take part in that meeting in any way or give a vote.

Mr Ramsden retorted that he had consulted an authority, and he most certainly contended that he had a perfect right to vote, and intended to do so.

Mr Bastow having read the requisition for the calling of the meeting, remarked that it was the duty of the ratepayers to elect a chairman to preside, and he should be glad if they would do so; and ultimately Mr Joseph Thomas was elected to the seat of honour.

The Chairman, on rising, spoke in favour of the footpath being stopped. He had known it all his life, and it was not a convenience as to distance, so well as being worse, and more uneven than the high road. It was for the meeting to determine whether it was worth their while to stop that road or not. Many had come to the opinion that it was of no more use to the ratepayers as a footpath, and in summer time it had been the cause of crops being destroyed at a great loss to the farmer as well as to the public at large.

Mr Powell: Ask him to say something on the other side of the question.

A Ratepayer: It is the most convenient footpath is the township.

Mr John Wilkes, Bragg Lane End, protested against the footpath being stopped. There had been three attempts made to stop it, and all had failed. He would do all in his power to keep the footpath open.

Mr William Briggs, Red Hall, thought the footpath was inconvenient and dangerous to the little village below. There was a bridge over which it was very easy to trip and break a leg. The bridge had to be kept in repair by those who belonged to the footpath.

A Ratepayer: This is the thin end of the wedge – the old, old style; there has been too much of this kind in times gone by. We shall not have a public footpath if we go on.

Mr George Jacques said that evidently Mr Fox had made up his mind to fight the ratepayers to the end with the ratepayers’ money. They would throw money away and lose the footpath in the end.

A Voice: George Lane Fox cannot. He has not the power.

Mr Jacques: It would be a saving to George Lane Fox and the ratepayers as well.

Mr Joseph Pearson’s opinion, which he said was that of all sensible people, that the footpath was of no earthly use as a footpath. No doubt Mr Lane Fox would take action, and those who did oppose it must get their cash ready (uproar). He proposed that the footpath be stopped.

Mr Wilcock, farmer, Newton, seconded the proposition.

Mr Charles Howden proposed that the footpath be kept opened. They must nip this in the bud or they would find all their footpaths stopped at some future time.

Mr Edward Steele seconded the amendment, and also proposed that some one be appointed to check votes against Mr Thomas, both for and against.

Amidst extreme uproar and disorder a show of hands was taken in favour of keeping the footpath open, but it was an impossibility to count them properly, Mr Bastow remarking that he had counted 68, but was not certain that this was correct.

It was then unanimously agreed the votes should be counted as the voters passed out of the door. This left the room entirely occupied by those who were in favour of stopping the footpath, and the Chairman, having consulted with some of those present, at once announced that the meeting was adjourned until Tuesday next at five o’clock.

This announcement was received by those outside with the greatest surprise and consternation. In all rushed, and hard words and recriminations flew about wholesale, it being stated that most of the ratepayers being working men, could not attend at that hour.

Mr Edward Steele declared the chairman had no right, immediately their backs were turned, and whilst the votes were being taken, to postpone the meeting, and he gave notice that he should fight the legality of the point to the end.

Others expressed themselves dissatisfied, and amidst great confusion the meeting terminated.