Local government reform five years before the creation of Stanley Urban District Council left local residents worried about increasing rates – and in particular, the cost to the rate-payer of holding an election.
Who Shall be Pariah Councillors?
MEETING AT WRENTHORPE
Wakefield Free Press
Saturday 10 November 1894
A meeting of the ratepayers of Wrenthorpe – called by the bellman – was held on Tuesday evening in the Board School, to consider the Parish Councils Act, and if possible select five candidates for the Wrenthorpe Ward. On the motion of Mr. Asquith [Liberal], the Vicar (Rev. Mr. Burroughs [sic]) was called upon to preside, and proceeded to briefly explain the Act. What they wanted to do, in his opinion, was to keep all questions of a religious or political nature entirely out of sight – the subject had nothing to do with politics and had nothing to do with religion. They all had to pay the same taxes, and they ought to put in the men who they thought would do best for them. For his part, he should not care whether a man was a Churchman or a Dissenter, a Liberal, or whatever else he might be, so long as he thought he was a good man for that part of the parish. Mr. E. Steele said they wanted to be able to hold their own, and not allow the people of Outwood to dominate over them. Mr William Pearson [Tory] said that while the ratepayers were made all-powerful by the new Act, he would like them to use strict economy. They would be able to provide a reading room, a bowling green, and have allotments. The humblest ratepayer would have a voice in the matter, and he should not like them to have this feeling that they would vote for all those things, because it did not make much difference to them. If they threw too much burden on the capitalist it might prove a very serious matter, especially during the present depression – it meant killing the goose that laid the golden egg, and perhaps driving industries out of the district. He should like to see all the objects of the Act carried out, but with the strictest economy. Let them choose suitable men – men with judgment to carry out the power given to them. The Chairman reminded Mr. Pearson that there were various restrictions in the Act as to expenditure. Mr. Pearson: We must be very careful in the present depression.
The meeting then proceeded to nominate members for the ward, the Chairman reminding those present that what they did was informal, and that the legal nominations must be made on 4th Dec., at a meeting to be held that day. Mr. Asquith proposed, and Mr. G. Wilks seconded Mr. W. Pearson, but that gentleman declined to stand. Mr. Pearson proposed and Mr. Steele seconded Mr. Tom Thompson. Mr. C. Render proposed Mr. George Brooke; seconded by Mr. J. Kershaw. Mr. A. Moorby proposed the Vicar, and Mr. Pearson seconded. The Vicar: Thank you, but don’t propose me. I have got more than I can possibly do if I stick to my allotted work. I am sure you will get five good men and true in the township. Mr. J. Whiteley proposed Mr. William Morris; seconded by Mr. Rinder. Mr. John Parkin was next proposed, but he declined.
Mr. J. Lindley pointed out that the names so far proposed were all from one class, and seeing that they had a fair number of miners in the district, he thought they ought to be represented. The Chairman: I think they ought to be represented on the Council. Mr. Asquith proposed, and Mr. J. Kershaw seconded, Mr. J. Lindley as a candidate; and Mr. Lindley proposed, and Mr. T. Thompson seconded, Mr. E. Steele.
In the course of some conversation on any possible rivalry that might occur between Outwood and Wrenthorpe, Mr. Asquith said that as a member of the Parochial Committee he had always been treated in a kindly and considerate manner by the Outwood representatives. He had not seen any attempt made to secure greater benefits for Outwood than for Wrenthorpe. Some conversation ensued as to giving further time for consideration before deciding finally on the names, and it was ultimately agreed to adjourn the meeting for a fortnight. A hearty vote of thanks to the Chairman concluded the business.
The Free Press subsequently covers the ensuing meeting. The concern about the social class of candidate is notable, and this again comes to the fore in the 1899 Stanley UDC elections.
Wakefield Free Press
Saturday 24 November 1894
MEETING AT WRENTHORPE.
DIFFICULTIES OF A GUARDIAN
An adjourned meeting of the ratepayers of Wrenthorpe was held on Tuesday evening, at the Board School – the Vicar (Rev. Mr. Burroughs [sic]) again presiding. The object of the gathering was to see if the electors could agree upon five men for the Wrenthorpe Ward of the Parish Council, and so avoid the cost of a poll. At the first meeting the following five gentlemen were nominated:- Messrs. T. Thompson, George Brooke, William Morris, Joseph Lindley, and E. Steele; and on Tuesday the following additional nominations were made – Messrs. E. Bateman, John Wilks, Joseph Parkin, William Schofield, Thomas Asquith, George Lockwood, William Wilks, Mark Frost, and J. Speight. On Mr. Frost being asked if he would stand, he caused great amusement by replying: I have stood all my life. As there was an expressed intention to nominate Mr. Asquith for the District Council, he withdrew his name for the Parish Council; and the voting by show of hands resulted as follows:-
Jo. Parkin 35, Mark Frost 31, Wm. Schofield 29, E. Steele 26, T. Thompson 25, Wm. Morris 24, Geo. Lockwood 23, Geo. Brooke 12, Jo. Lindley 11, John Wilks 10, Jo. Speight 8, Wm. Wilks 7, E. Bateman 4.
The Chairman declared the first five the choice of the meeting, and said he hoped that on the 4th December those present would be loyal to the decision of the meeting.
It was decided to consider the question of the District Council; and for that Mr. T. Asquith, the present Guardian, and Mr. H. Roberts were nominated. The Chairmen said be thought it would be best to leave the question of the District Council over. The question was would the meeting stick to the five names for the Parish Council which they had chosen? (A Voice: I think they will, sir).
Mr. Geo. Lockwood asked if Mr. Wm. Morris would agree to this, if the names below him in number withdrew? No answer was, however, given to this question.
Mr. J. Lindley said that at the last meeting he asked that the miners, who were a large part of the electorate should have a representative. This they had secured in their friend Mr. Frost, and therefore, in order to save the cost of a poll, he would withdraw his name (hear. hear).
Mr. Frost said he was a little bit satisfied they had selected him for office – it was the first office he had in his life (laughter and applause). If any man would do his bit of writing he would stand like a man and work as hard as he could (hear, hear).
Mr. Steele said they were a small area, and if they went to the expense of a poll it would mean something like £15 or £20. As to their position, they had been badly handicapped in Wrenthorpe up to the last moment, and the five who would be elected for that ward would have to be combined together, and not let the Outwood people get the “rise out of them,” or they would be involved in considerable expense.
Mr. Asquith said he had tried to do his duty for the three years he had been on the Board, and if the ratepayers thought he had not done his duty, he was willing to stand aside. He had spent something like four days a week at the work for the last six months; and be had had a good many uphill jobs in which he had not given satisfaction to everyone. He had had to come and see property owners and tenants about compensation in regard to damage owing to the drainage works, and be could assure them he was very sorry when a man came to him in the Market last Friday and said – “I have always treated you as friend, but I am afraid I will have to treat you as an enemy.” And what was that for? Because he would not give as much more of the ratepayers’ money than the person was entitled to – because he would not give 2d. for 1d., and that was why he was called by that name. In another ease he had to meet Mr. Haldane about the damage done to a certain field belonging to a market gardener. He estimated the damage at £8, and Mr. Haldane at £15, and in the end he agreed to £9. At Mr Lane Fox’s rent audit dinner at the Strafford Arms the other night, tow gardeners and a farmer met together, and the person concerned was asked how he had got [?] very poorly, and that he would have done better “if it had not been for that – Asquith” (“Oh”). All he had to say was, that he had tried to do right by the ratepayers, and not take a penny out of the ratepayers’ pockets and give it to somebody else (applause).
After some further conversation, the meeting closed with a vote of thanks to the chairman.